Colorado Civil Unions Bill Dies in Special Session

[Ed. Note:  Colorado voters passed a Defense of Marriage Act in 2006, defining marriage as between one man and one woman.  This is the reason that Rep. Don Coram refused to vote in favor of the civil unions bill on Monday and it died in the legislature on that day.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://www.christianpost.com/news/colorado-civil-unions-bill-dies-in-special-session-74955/

By Paul Stanley , Christian Post Reporter
May 15, 2012|11:30 am

A Colorado House committee rejected Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper‘s proposal for civil unions, which he calls a “fundamental question of fairness and civil rights,” in a razor-thin 5-4 vote along party lines during a special legislative session Monday.

The Colorado governor called the special session, saying he wanted to give same-sex couples similar rights to married couples. However, Democrats, who had no expectations the bill would ever pass, wanted to use the issue as a political weapon in their hopes to regain control from the Republicans in November.

Republicans hold a narrow 33-32 majority in the Colorado House of Representatives.

One GOP member who voted against the bill and whose son is homosexual claims Democrats are using the gay community for purely political reasons.

“The gay community is being used as a political pawn,” Rep. Don Coram told The Associated Press.

Coram said another reason he could not vote for the bill was because in 2006 Coloradans voted to ban gay marriage.

“What you’re asking me to do here is invalidate the vote of six years ago,” he said. “For four years we had a Democrat governor, a Democrat House and a Democrat Senate. The issue never came up. It only came up when we got spilt. I think that’s wrong.”

The vote is yet another setback for gay rights activists who suffered a loss last week when over 60 percent of North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

And, according to several black pastors, President Obama has lost support in the black community over last week’s announcement that his views on same-sex marriage have “evolved” and he now publicly supports the issue.

Prior to the Colorado House’s adjournment of the regular session, Democrats accused Republicans of filibustering the issue by talking about other bills that were not related to civil unions, thus missing a key deadline in order for the bill to be voted on.

Hickenlooper wasted no time in calling for a special session after the regular session adjourned on Wednesday. “Transparency, accountability and the virtues of good government are compromised when the legislative clock is used to avoid consideration of important legislation,” the governor wrote in a letter to legislators prior to the special session.

Democratic leaders in the House pledged to bring the issue back next year.

“If it fails this year, we’re going to work hard to make sure the public understands what happened, the games that were played, and next we’re going to push it again,” Rep. Mark Ferrandino, the Democratic leader in the House, told AP.

El Paso County GOP Vice Chairman David Williams called the bill an “end-run around the constitution.”

Although a handful of states allow same-sex marriage, last week’s North Carolina vote was the 32nd straight time voters have either rejected same-sex marriage or defined marriage as between a man and a woman.

Posted in gay agenda | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Anglican Parish of Christ the Redeemer moving to Canonsburg, PA

[Ed. Note:  The former St. David's Anglican in Peters Township is relinquishing their building to the Diocese of Pittsburgh and moving to a new location in Canonsburg.  For more information, go to their website at www.christ-the-redeemer.com.     Cheryl M. Wetzel]

Press Release from the Rev. David Wilson, Rector, Christ the Redeemer

May 14, 2012

for more information contact Lawna Blankenship-724-942-3504

Redeemer Parish to Move to Canonsburg

The Anglican Parish of Christ the Redeemer (formally St. David’s Anglican Church) will vacate its property at 905 East McMurray, Road Peters Township PA on May 31, turning it over to the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh on that date.   The Rev. David Wilson, rector of Redeemer Parish stressed, “We hold no acrimony toward the new occupants of our former property.  We wish them well and we hope they and their newly elected bishop Dorsey McConnell will faithfully contend for the faith as once delivered to the saints.”

St. David’s has a long history of leadership in the renewal and reformation of the faith, first through the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh and now in the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh and the Anglican Church in North America.   Wilson said, “As we look back, we can recall how God has blessed our efforts in the past and we have every confidence He will continue that blessing in the future as we strive to remain faithful ministers of his Word and sacraments.”

The Rev. Don Bushyager, the associate rector of Redeemer Parish and whose family have been members for thirty years, states.  “We have been facing into the reality that the courts awarded our property to the Episcopal Church and it no longer belonged to us the people and parish that financed, built, maintained and cared for it over the years.   Our parish moved to Peters Township almost sixty years ago and now we move on.  We leave taking with us resolve to stand firm on the Word of God, to preach Christ and Him crucified and to offer others the same grace we have received.  We are starting once again in a new place and in a new community.  We are missionaries and we will take the gospel of hope to the lost and hurting people living in Canonsburg.  And someday we will return to Peters Township and leave to the good people of Canonsburg a strong, gospel-centered Anglican Church planted there.”

Our first service at our new worship site will at Christ the Redeemer Parish, 120 East College Street in Canonsburg on Pentecost Sunday, May 27 at 10 AM.   Beginning on June 3 our Sunday worship schedule will be a traditional service of Holy Communion at 8 AM and a family-oriented service of Holy Communion at 10:30 AM.   Childcare is offered at both services and children’s ministry at the latter service.  A contemporary Saturday worship service will be offered starting June 16.  All are invited to join us! Visit: www.christ-the-redeemer.com.                                                      #

 

For more information, call The Rev. David Wilson at 724-941-4060, until May 18.

Posted in Diocese of Pittsburgh, General news, Property Litigation | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Falls Church congregation vacating historic property

[Ed. Note:  The Falls Church will worship next Sunday at Kenmore Middle School, Falls Church.  Beginning in June, they will worship in the auditorium of Bishop O'Connell High School in Arlington.  Go to their website for more complete information on service times.  http://www.thefallschurch.org/  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

ttp://www.bizjournals.com/washington/morning_call/2012/05/falls-church-congregation-vacating.html

Washington Business Journal

Date: Monday, May 14, 2012, 5:51am EDT

Members of The Falls Church Anglican, a congregation of 4,000 worshipers, have been ordered to vacate the historic church property for which the city of Falls Church is named, WTOP reported.

Parishioners on Sunday spent their last Sunday attending services before leaving the building for the last time. The church was established in 1732. The move was made after the parish lost a long-running court battle. The congregation went through a nasty split precipitated by divisions within The Episcopal Church over the ordination of a gay bishop and other theological issues.

Posted in General news, Property Litigation | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Local clergy: Obama’s marriage stance nonissue

[Ed. Note:  There is little else in the news.  Reactions are still registering for the gay marriage endorsement given by President Obama this past week. This is yet another.  Bishop Andrew Waldo, Upper South Carolina, is quoted  saying Obama's statement will not change anything re:  this summer's General Convention.  I disagree.  TEC's General  Convention will discuss a national marriage ceremony.  This is non-essential because these ceremonies are going on nationwide now, without the consent of the local bishop or the General Convention.  What is will do is prompt a higher level, louder, more insistent, more strident  response from the gays and lesbians who want legal, national marriage .   This response will be a campaign worthy of a case study.  Gird your loins, folks!  It is going to be a controversial and conflict-filled  6 months.  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://www.thestate.com/2012/05/12/2272939/local-clergy-obamas-marriage-stance.html

Saturday, May 12, 2012

By CAROLYN CLICK – cclick@thestate.com  for The State, Columbia South Carolina

 

President Barack Obama’s evolution on the issue of same-sex marriage isn’t likely to affect the theological debates underway in mainline Protestant denominations or alter the longtime opposition to such unions among Roman Catholics, Southern Baptists and African Methodist Episcopal clergy and parishioners, some clergy said Friday.

“Actually I draw a line between the theological and the civil,” said the Rev. Joe Darby, pastor of Morris Brown AME Church in Charleston. “The president was speaking as President Obama, not Bishop Obama or Reverand (sic) Obama.”

Darby said he can understand the president’s desire to assure equality for all Americans, including gays and lesbians who have fought to dismantle the traditional view of marriage as between a man and a woman to gain some civil rights in society.

But he said the AME church is clear in not recognizing same-sex marriage and in revoking the ordination of bishops or pastors who perform such ceremonies.

“People have been talking through it and in that talking through it, the bottom line for most people is ‘I don’t agree with the president but there have been points when I haven’t agreed with other presidents, but that hasn’t stopped me from voting for him.” Darby said he does not think this will erode the traditional African-American support for the Obama. Darby said he plans to write a pastoral letter to his congregation.

Among Roman Catholics and white Protestant evangelicals, many already deeply skeptical about the president, the disappointment – and criticism – was more palpable.

Frank Page, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s executive committee and a former pastor from Taylors, told Baptist Press he was “deeply disappointed” by Obama’s announcement.

“No matter what culture may dictate with its ever-changing winds, I am grateful for the sure and unchanging source of authority we have in Scripture,” Page said. “We must hold to God’s Word on this and many other issues.”

The bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Upper South Carolina said Friday Obama’s embrace of same-sex marriage isn’t likely to alter the ongoing theological and social debate in his church, a debate that has roiled the church over the past 30 years.

“I don’t think it is going to add anything significant to the discussion,” said Bishop W. Andrew Waldo. “I think we are already so deep in this conversation that it is not going to affect us.”

The Episcopal Church in the United States, like other mainline Protestant denominations including Lutherans, Presbyterians and United Methodists, have inched toward more liberality on the issue, but ignited fierce debate in the process.

That is illustrated in South Carolina which has two Episcopal dioceses and two distinct takes on the issue. The Rt. Rev. Mark Lawrence, the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, which represents 70 Lowcountry congregations and 29,000 members, has been outspoken for years in his opposition to the ordination of gay bishops and the blessing of same sex unions.

Waldo, like his predecessor the Rt. Rev. Dorsey Henderson Jr., has tried to walk a more moderate path in hopes of bridging the divergent views in his 64 congregation, 28,000-member diocese.

“There are certainly members of the church and members of the diocese who believe it is a justice issue, but we have as many who believe that it is a theological issue,” Waldo said. “The stand that I’ve taken for a long time is that when Jesus called the disciples to love one another, he also called the disciples to give themselves up for each other.

“The question that I’m asking is, ‘What are we willing to give up for the sake of each other?’”

At the national convention of the Episcopal Church in July, Waldo and other bishops will take up the issue of the blessing of same-sex unions, although Waldo said “there is not going to be a vote that says here is what the church is going to do. It will be for experimentation and contemplation.”

“I’m looking for a way to go forward,” Waldo said. “I’m far more interested in spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ and ministering to the needs of those who are poor or hungry or homeless or in prison.

“We have congregations who are eager to go forward in mission, to develop their vibrancy in spiritual matters,” he said, and this issue can be distracting.

“I don’t have any question that it takes away from those issues,” Waldo said. “But on the other hand it is an important decision to be addressed.”

Posted in gay agenda, General news | Tagged | Comments Off

The Role of Gay Marriage in this Presidential Election

[Ed. Note:  When you take a long look at the last three weeks, you see Hillary Clinton endorsing gay marriage; Vice President Joe Biden endorsing gay marriage last Sunday on "Meet the Press" and the final ramp up to the North Carolina Amendment One vote.  North Carolina, in an uncharacteristically high turn out, endorsed Amendment One 60% to 39% against.  Every time gay marriage has been on a ballot, it has lost.  Then the very same day that the election results were certified, Obama declared he favors gay marriage.  Sheepishly, he implied that his hand was tipped by the Vice President's declaration.  I do not believe this is true.  This was a perfectly calculated and timed campaign to announce prior to the trip yesterday to California.  It would produce double the "take" in contributions - and did.  Then, let's release the story about Mitt the bully and homophobe. This is a case study in PR101, perfectly executed.  America, wake up!  Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://blogs.christianpost.com/disciple/gay-marriage-election-9857/

by Kae Am for the blog “Disciple of Thecla”  on the Christian Post website

May 11, 2012

Whenever I heard people arguing about whether Obama was a Christian or a Muslim, I typically responded, “Neither. Obama worships himself.” And he has recently brought social issues into the campaign where he was able to receive millions of dollars by celebrities who spent much of their lives engaged in fiction. Now, there is a time and place for social issues. Social issues need to have a discussion, and they dominate my blog. However, because the economy is threatening to collapse around everyone, the current political election is neither time nor place to make gay marriage a focus point. I preferred Mitt Romney over Rick Santorum because Mitt Romney focused strongly on the economy.
.
So, why is Obama now supporting gay marriage? The answers became obvious the next day. Obama supported gay marriage in a liberal attempt to raise money from celebrities and to smear Romney as a bigot.
.
The next day, news emerged that Mitt Romney forcibly cut a classmate’s hair half a century ago on suspicion that the classmate was gay. Cutting someone’s hair is incredibly benign compared to what children to do each other today. The strange thing is that the classmate died eight years ago in 2004 on the other coast and therefore could not have brought up the allegation. This means that someone purposefully investigated Romney’s past back half a century to find material for a smear campaign. The fact that they had to search so far back indicates that they could not find anything current.
.
But Romney’s campaign platform is not about marriage. Romney’s campaign platform is about the economy. Romney focuses upon what will benefit everyone, homosexuals and heterosexuals. Obama came out to support himself because he cannot campaign upon his economic record.
.
Gay marriage will not help homosexuals find jobs when there are no jobs to be found. Laws already exist which forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation. Marriage will not help anyone find jobs because employers do not discriminate between married and single.
.
While Obama focuses upon pleasing the minority with false promises, Romney focuses upon helping all people regardless of who they are. Receiving millions of dollars, Obama said, ”Are we a country that includes everybody and give everybody a shot and treats everybody fairly?” But no one has a shot to succeed in a broken economy. What is fair and just will be a booming economy that will enable all people – homosexual as well as heterosexual – to be independent and self-sufficient.
.
Marriage is not necessary for personal survival. When I was unemployed last year and debt threatened me, I never thought “I need a husband!” Instead, I thought “I need a job!” Can you imagine telling single women that they need marriage to survive? How would they react? Marriage is not necessary for anyone’s personal survival. So, why is Obama endorsing gay marriage when marriage will not help them through a difficult economy? Married couples suffer unemployment, debt, and foreclosure. Marriage cannot protect them from unemployment, debt, and foreclosure, so both partners search for their own jobs to provide food and shelter. A job and a stable economy are necessary for personal survival.
.
Obama has merely come out to finance his own campaign and to smear Romney. Gay marriage is not even a part of his platform and not even a stated objective, yet he has discussed “equality” nonstop this past week. For this presidential election, let us focus on what will benefit all Americans regardless of sexual orientation. Let’s focus on who will benefit the economy.

Posted in gay agenda, General news | Tagged | Comments Off

Assemblies of God Opposes Obama’s Same-Sex Marriage Stance

http://www.christianpost.com/news/assemblies-of-god-opposes-obamas-same-sex-marriage-stance-74797/

By Michael Gryboski , Christian Post Reporter
May 11, 2012|11:22 am

One of the largest Pentecostal denominations in the United States has officially announced its opposition to President Barack Obama’s stance on same-sex marriage.

The Assemblies of God USA, a fellowship with more than 3 million members, sent out a statement on Thursday addressing the president’s recent remarks endorsing gay marriage. “The Bible clearly teaches that marriage should be a life-long commitment between one man and one woman,” said Dr. George O. Wood, general superintendent of the Assemblies.

“Although it has become popular to quote Scripture grossly out of context to serve a personal or political agenda, it still doesn’t change what God’s Word clearly states.”

During the 2008 presidential election, then candidate Senator Barack Obama did not endorse same-sex marriage. Throughout his presidency, as pressure from gay rights groups continued, Obama spoke of his position on the issue as “evolving,” which resulted in criticism from both the right and the left over his ambivalence.

On Sunday, Vice President Joe Biden said on NBC’s “Meet The Press” that he was “absolutely comfortable” with same-sex marriage being legal, which added increased pressure on the president to make an announcement of support. Obama’s statement of support came on Wednesday.

“[Michelle and I are] both practicing Christians … when we think about our faith the thing at root that we think about is not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf but it’s also the Golden Rule – treat others the way you’d want to be treated,” said Obama after affirming to ABC News that “same-sex couples should be able to get married.”

According to the Assemblies of God’s official position, “the growing cultural acceptance of homosexual identity and behavior, male and female, is symptomatic of a broader spiritual disorder that threatens the family, the government, and the church.”

“Homosexual activities of every kind are contrary to the moral commandments God has given us.”

Other church leaders and denominations have made statements both in support and opposition to Obama’s remarks on the divisive social issue.

Joel Hunter, often considered Obama’s spiritual adviser, told The Christian Post in an earlier interview that he was disappointed in the president’s reasoning.

“The Golden Rule is in the Bible but it cannot be used to contradict God’s marriage pattern reaffirmed by Jesus in Matthew 19:4-5,” said Hunter.

“Though I disagree with the president’s interpretation of Scripture in this crucial issue, I will not abandon our friendship … I will just keep telling him what I believe the Bible says and leave the rest to God.”

The Rt. Rev. Larry R. Benfield, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Arkansas, released a statement supporting Obama’s remarks.

“I agree with the president’s position. Contrary to the North Carolina decision, civil marriage of same-gender couples will one day be seen as good for society,” said Benfield. “I look forward to the day when such marriages occur in this state so that we can live with one another in a spirit of equality and justice.”

Obama’s remarks came the day after voters in North Carolina overwhelmingly supported an amendment to the state constitution that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman and banned any other type of domestic legal union.

 

Posted in gay agenda, General news | Tagged | Comments Off

Franklin Graham: Obama has shaken his fist at God

     Thursday, May 10, 2012 01:00 PM  

By: Andra Varin  for newsmax.com

Evangelist Franklin Graham said President Barack Obama has “shaken his fist at God” by voicing support for gay marriage.

In an interview Wednesday with ABC News, Obama said his opinions had evolved and he now believes same-sex couples should have the right to wed.

“At a certain point, I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get married,” Obama said.

Graham, son of the Rev. Billy Graham, said the president was defying God’s will by changing his opinion on the issue.

“President Obama has, in my view, shaken his fist at the same God who created and defined marriage. It grieves me that our president would now affirm same-sex marriage, though I believe it grieves God even more,” Graham said in a statement.

“This is a sad day for America. May God help us,” he said.

Graham supported a measure to amend North Carolina’s constitution to bar gay marriage. Voters on Tuesday passed the amendment with a 61 percent approval rate.

Graham has criticized Obama on spiritual matters in the past. In February, he publicly questioned whether Obama is really a Christian and said “Islam has gotten a free pass” under Obama’s administration. Graham later apologized.

 

Posted in gay agenda, General news | Tagged , | Comments Off

Same Bible, Different Verdict On Gay Marriage

[Ed. Note:  President Obama's declaration on gay marriage this past week has set off a fire storm of comment and controversy.  Barbara Hagerty covers religion topics for National Public Radio (NPR) and this is her program from Friday, May 11.  This is one of 10 different commentaries today on the topic on NPR. And a possible 40 other articles/editorials on the subject in the national  news papers today. Cheryl M. Wetzel]

http://www.npr.org/2012/05/11/152466134/same-bible-different-verdict-on-gay-marriage

by Barbara Bradley Hagerty  for National Public Radio (NPR)

May 11, 2012

When President Obama announced he now supports same-sex marriage, he cited his Christian faith.

“The thing at root that we think about is, not only Christ sacrificing himself on our behalf, but it’s also the Golden Rule, you know — treat others the way you would want to be treated,” he said in his interview with ABC News.

Many other people cited their religion to disagree, raising the question: How can people read the same Bible and come to opposite conclusions about same-sex relationships?

Homosexuality: In Biblical Terms

It’s true, says Carmen Fowler LaBerge: You can be a Christian and support same-sex marriage, but, she says, “nobody can say gay marriage is biblical. That’s just foolishness.”

LaBerge resigned her post as minister in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) after the denomination voted last year to ordain noncelibate gay clergy. She says the Bible is clear.

“From the Old Testament and throughout the New Testament, the only sexual relationships that are affirmed in scripture are those in the context of marriage between one man and one woman,” she says.

Actually, the Old Testament does condone polygamy. Still, LaBerge says, from Leviticus to Paul’s writings in Romans and First Corinthians, homosexual acts are called vile and detestable, and legalizing same-sex relationships does not change the sin.

Not so fast, says the Rev. Susan Russell, an Episcopal priest at All Saints Church in Pasadena, Calif. She takes her cues from Jesus.

“Jesus never said a single word about anything even remotely connected to homosexuality,” she says.

Jesus does say the most important commandments are “Love God” and “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Given that, Russell believes if Jesus were here today, he would celebrate committed, same-sex relationships.

The Bible Vs. Culture

Russell says you take the Bible literally at your folly.

“When you read the Bible, you can find justification for almost anything,” she says, “including slavery, the subjection of women and an argument that the sun actually revolves around the earth.”

Russell and other liberal Christians argue the Bible is the living word of God, and much like the U.S. Constitution, needs to be interpreted as society changes.

But LaBerge says the issue is which has more sway: the Bible or culture?

“There’s a stream of faith that would recognize that the Bible continues to have authority, and that we are obligated to submit ourselves, our wills and our desires to it,” she says. “And there’s a stream of faith that would say that human experience actually trumps — or is an authority over — the Bible at this point.”

Reaction In Black Churches

Homosexual behavior is a fault line splitting Christian denominations in two — Episcopalians, Methodists, Presbyterians, Catholics — there’s even a wide gulf between young and old Evangelicals. But nowhere is this question more fraught than in African-American churches, says Tony Evans. He pastors the 9,000-member Oak Cliff Bible Fellowship in Dallas. One reason, he says, is cultural.

“The breakdown of the family is the single greatest challenge that we face today,” he says.

Evans and others say the black family is in crisis — a majority of babies, for example, are born to single mothers — and that’s why black ministers are often the most vocal opponents of same-sex marriage. Asked about the argument that this is a civil rights issue, Evans bristles.

“The issue of race is not an issue of choice. It’s an issue of birth,” he says.

Does that mean that homosexuality is a choice?

“The Bible is clear on that one, too. And that is, sexual relationships are to be between men and women within the context of marriage,” Evans says. “That’s not only related to the issue of homosexuality, but adultery, or fornication or bestiality. All of that is proscribed in the Bible.”

Envisioning God’s Kingdom

Graylan Hagler, the pastor of Plymouth Congregational United Church of Christ in Washington, D.C., says “of course it’s a civil rights issue.”

Hagler notes that there are plenty of blacks who are gay, and they, too, should have access to the God-given institution of marriage. To him, legitimizing marriage for committed gay couples is precisely what the Bible envisioned.

“I just think of the words from Galatians where it says, ‘There is neither Greek nor Jew, male nor female, slave nor free,’ ” he says. “And what is happening there is that they’re pointing to what the kingdom of God looks like … it’s open to everybody and everybody has equal status.”

Of course, conservatives say that the best blueprint for God’s kingdom on earth does not spring from what you read between the lines of the Bible, but what you read in black and white.

 

Posted in gay agenda, General Convention 2012, General news | Tagged | Comments Off

Archbishop of Wales elected to Crown Nominations Commission

http://episcopaldigitalnetwork.com/ens/2012/05/10/archbishop-of-wales-elected-to-crown-nominations-commission/

By ACNS staff

May 10, 2012

Archbishop Barry Morgan of the Church in Wales has been elected to serve on the Crown Nominations Commission for Canterbury, the body that will nominate the next archbishop of Canterbury.

Morgan was elected by members of the Standing Committee of the Anglican Communion, which had been asked to nominate one primate to represent the Anglican Communion on the commission. Their chosen Primates were grouped according to the five regions of the communion — Africa; Central, North and South Americas & the Caribbean; East Asia & Oceania; Europe; Middle East & West Asia. The Standing Committee then voted by single transferable vote — the method agreed by the Anglican Consultative Council for all its elections — and Morgan’s name emerged.

The vote took place by e-mail and was overseen by the chair and vice chair of the Standing Committee with advice from its legal adviser.

This is the first time that a primate of the Anglican Communion has been invited to serve on the Crown Nominations Commission.

The Secretary General of the Anglican Communion, the Rev. Canon Kenneth Kearon, is a ex-officio member of the commission.

The Crown Nominations Commission will put its recommendation for the next archbishop to the U.K. Prime Minister, who will seek the agreement of Her Majesty The Queen. It is expected that the name of the new archbishop will be announced in the autumn.

The commission is a largely church-elected body, including both clergy and lay members and representatives of the worldwide Anglican Communion. In late April, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron appointed the Rt. Hon. Lord Luce to be chairman of the Crown Nominations Commission.

Posted in Anglican Communion, Bishop Elections, General news | Tagged , | Comments Off

Court rules in favor of Episcopal Church, L.A. diocese

http://episcopaldigitalnetwork.com/ens/2012/05/10/court-rules-in-favor-of-episcopal-church-l-a-diocese/

May 10, 2012 3:02 PM

Posted by Episcopal News Service

[Diocese of Los Angeles] Orange County Superior Court Judge Kim Dunning today granted a motion for summary adjudication in favor of the Episcopal Church declaring the church properties in Long Beach and North Hollywood are held in trust for the current and future mission of the Diocese of Los Angeles and the general church.

“I give thanks for this ruling. After nearly eight years, we appreciate the Court’s conclusion confirming the church properties of All Saints and St. David’s belong to the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles,” said the Rt. Rev. J. Jon Bruno, Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles.

John R. Shiner, lead counsel for the Diocese, added, “Today’s ruling marks the third occasion that a Court has determined property under the control of a departing parish rightfully belongs to the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles.”

Posted in Property Litigation | Tagged , , | Comments Off